Writer Dave Barry says scientists can alter the genetic
structures of living things using genetic knowledge "and a pair of very tiny pliers."
If only it were that easy for herpetoculturists.
Instead, our tools are the animal husbandry practices that keep our snakes healthy and strong while
we apply the genetic principles esssential to our success.
Here are the principles herpetoculturists need to understand, and the breeding results that follow:
(Once you've read this, I'd welcome E-mail from you
telling me where I lost you, what I could explain better (and how), where I've made mistakes, or
what other information you'd like to see here.)
Genetic Principles:
(such a mutation is called recessive because if paired with another, "dominant" gene, the
recessive gene recedes into the backround--it is overpowered by the dominant gene and the dominant
gene determines the color of the animal)
Breeding Expectations
Remember these generalizations apply to large samples. In small numbers, such as the total number
of eggs a female might produce in a clutch--or even in a lifetime--the results can vary greatly,
just as the odds of tossing heads or tails with a coin are 50-50 but you'll not always throw
two heads in four throws, or ten in twenty.
=All homozygous (albinos, in this example)
=1/2 homozygous (hypos, in this example)
=1/4 homozygous (anerythristics, in this example)
(double-het for snow, for example)
You're right. Things get a little trickier here. Maybe a lot.
Think of this pairing as TWO het x het pairings combined (one, of het/albino x het/albino, and the
other, of het/anery x het/anery): Remember the het x het explanation above? The het/alb x het/alb
portion of this breeding will produce 1/4 albinos, 2/4 het/albinos, and 1/4 normals. Remember, too,
that the het/anery x het/anery pairing will produce babies, 1/4 of which are anerythristic (and 2/4
of which are het/anery, and 1/4 of which are normal). Consider a sample of 16 babies, which is
necessary to illuminate the results here: FOUR of the babies will be albinos, as I've just explained;
1/4 of all the babies will be anerythristic, so ONE (one-fourth) of those four albino babies will be
anerythristic as well. Anerythristic-albinos are snows, so 1/16 of the babies (1/4 of 1/4) will be
snows. Continuing that logic and those calculations results in the full breakdown below:
=1/16 Homozygous (snows)
=2/16 albino het/anerythristic
=1/16 albino
=2/16 anerythristic het/albino
=4/16 double-hets for albino and anerythristic
=2/16 het/albino
=1/16 anerythristic
=2/16 het/anerythristic
=1/16 normal
=1/4 double-hets
=1/4 albino het/anerythristic
=1/4 anerythristic het/albino
=1/4 snows
"This would be the most efficient pairing for any large or even small scale breeder,"
e-mailed Dwight Good, an Elaphe obsolete ssp breeder in Guthrie, KY. "It would allow
the production of all four color anomalies from one pair of snakes, and would eliminate (the
production of) possible hets."
Dwight's right: You can see just how efficient it is by comparing it to the results of the
double-het x double-het pairing described earlier. Out of 16 babies, that double-het pairing
produces NINE different kinds of snakes genetically, with FOUR different appearances, and the
genetic makeup of only ONE of those 16--the snow--is known with certainty.
When a double-homozygous animal is substituted for one of the double-hets in the pairing,
however, only FOUR different kinds of snakes genetically are produced, and ALL FOUR are
distinguishable visually. Furthermore, the production of snows is quadrupled and the production
of albinos and anerythristics is increased, and those animals have the added advantage of always
being definite hets for the other mutation.
Instead of 15 snakes out of 16 whose genetic composition is uncertain, there are none. Still,
the double-het x double-het pairings are necessary to GET the double-homozygous animals that
produce such improved results, or the even more dramatic but possibly less interesting results,
below.
=ALL snow babies
This has to be one of the most fantastic genotypes imaginable. A single pair of triple hets will produce
albinos, anerythristics, and hypos, ghosts, snows, and hybinos!
I won't go into the precise percentages. But think of these snakes as being three different kinds
of double hets. So you'll get roughly
one-sixteenth ghosts, one-sixteenth snows, one-sixteenth hybinos, three-sixteenth albinos, three-sixteenth
anerythristics, three-sixteenth hypos--and the small remaining number of normal-looking babies, which will
be possible triple hets.
Imagine watching those clutches as they begin to hatch!
I'd like to thank my friend Bob Montoya for suggesting the triple het breeding. I'd like to thank
Dwight for sharing his thoughts. And thanks to Dr. Howard A. Bessen, Director of the Emergency
Medicine Residency Program at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, for the time and ideas he's
shared with me as I worked to improve this section. Lastly, I'd like to again urge all of you
to E-mail me to let me know where I lost you, what
I could explain better (and how?!), where I've made mistakes, or what other information would
be useful here.
|